Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/classes.php on line 584

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/classes.php on line 584

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/classes.php on line 584

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/classes.php on line 584

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/classes.php on line 603

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/classes.php on line 702

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/classes.php on line 702

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/classes.php on line 702

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/classes.php on line 702

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/classes.php on line 727

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 58

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/cache.php on line 99

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/cache.php on line 404

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/theme.php on line 576
Tims Wein- und IT-Blog » Blog Archive » 17 gegen 90

Strict Standards: mktime(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CET/1.0/no DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 19

Strict Standards: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CET/1.0/no DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 28

Strict Standards: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CET/1.0/no DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 30

Strict Standards: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CET/1.0/no DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 32

Strict Standards: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CET/1.0/no DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 33

Strict Standards: mktime(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CET/1.0/no DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 19

Strict Standards: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CET/1.0/no DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 28

Strict Standards: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CET/1.0/no DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 30

Strict Standards: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CET/1.0/no DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 32

Strict Standards: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CET/1.0/no DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 33

17 gegen 90

f├╝r mich wars ein klarer Fall. Mir sind 90 Parker Punkte im allgemeinen lieber als 17 Gabriel Punkte, f├╝r Bordeauxs versteht sich. Nun kritisierte ich k├╝rzlich heftig die Punktevergabe von Gabriel, bei dem scheinbar alles was schmeckt 17P bekommt, oft 18P. Na und, sagt mein Bruder, bei Parker h├Ąufen sich die Punkte im Bereich von 86-89. Stimmt eigentlich. Im oberen 90er Bereich hat Parker aber aufgrund des Systems mehr freiheiten und bewertet differenzierter. Was bringts frag ich mich? Ausser dem Martkwert machts doch kaum einen unterschied ob 99 pder 100P. Hier wird mir Gabriels System wieder sympathischer, denn zwischen 19 und 20P ist der Unterschied wohl hoffentlich schmeckbar.

Meine v├Âllig laienhafte Punkte erscheinem mir oft selbst nicht schl├╝ssig. Meine Wertungen sind zwar streng aber sie sagen wenig ├╝ber die Qualit├Ąt des Weins aus, auch nicht ├╝ber meinen Geschmack. Fast alles was ich sehr gut finde bekommt 90P plus/minus 2.
Dar├╝ber wage ich nicht zu bepunkten da ich noch Luft nach oben lassen m├Âchte - f├╝r Montrose 89 0der Sperss 90. ;) Unterhalb von 86P sind meine Punkte v├Âllig individuell. 84P f├╝r einen Bordeaux hei├čt der Wein schmeckt mir, er hat aber seine Macken wie deutlicher Muffton, oder zu kr├Ąftige S├Ąure, bzw. fehlende Frucht etc. Ein Italiener mit 84P landet hingegen meist am n├Ąchsten Tag im Ausguss.
genau genommen reicht mir f├╝r den Alltag gut, sehr gut, aussergew├Âhnlich…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.