Tims Wein- und IT-Blog

für mich wars ein klarer Fall. Mir sind 90 Parker Punkte im allgemeinen lieber als 17 Gabriel Punkte, für Bordeauxs versteht sich. Nun kritisierte ich kürzlich heftig die Punktevergabe von Gabriel, bei dem scheinbar alles was schmeckt 17P bekommt, oft 18P. Na und, sagt mein Bruder, bei Parker häufen sich die Punkte im Bereich von 86-89. Stimmt eigentlich. Im oberen 90er Bereich hat Parker aber aufgrund des Systems mehr freiheiten und bewertet differenzierter. Was bringts frag ich mich? Ausser dem Martkwert machts doch kaum einen unterschied ob 99 pder 100P. Hier wird mir Gabriels System wieder sympathischer, denn zwischen 19 und 20P ist der Unterschied wohl hoffentlich schmeckbar.

Meine völlig laienhafte Punkte erscheinem mir oft selbst nicht schlüssig. Meine Wertungen sind zwar streng aber sie sagen wenig über die Qualität des Weins aus, auch nicht über meinen Geschmack. Fast alles was ich sehr gut finde bekommt 90P plus/minus 2.
Darüber wage ich nicht zu bepunkten da ich noch Luft nach oben lassen möchte - für Montrose 89 0der Sperss 90. Unterhalb von 86P sind meine Punkte völlig individuell. 84P für einen Bordeaux heißt der Wein schmeckt mir, er hat aber seine Macken wie deutlicher Muffton, oder zu kräftige Säure, bzw. fehlende Frucht etc. Ein Italiener mit 84P landet hingegen meist am nächsten Tag im Ausguss.
genau genommen reicht mir für den Alltag gut, sehr gut, aussergewöhnlich…

This entry was posted on
Strict Standards: mktime(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CEST/2.0/DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 19

Strict Standards: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CEST/2.0/DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 28

Strict Standards: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CEST/2.0/DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 30

Strict Standards: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CEST/2.0/DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 32

Strict Standards: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CEST/2.0/DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 33
Friday, August 11th, 2006 at
Strict Standards: mktime(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CEST/2.0/DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 19

Strict Standards: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CEST/2.0/DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 28

Strict Standards: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CEST/2.0/DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 30

Strict Standards: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CEST/2.0/DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 32

Strict Standards: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Berlin' for 'CEST/2.0/DST' instead in /homepages/21/d19413512/htdocs/SITES/haegele.info/tim/wp-includes/functions.php on line 33
22:16 and is filed under Wein. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.